Newsfeed
Day newsfeed

Zaruhi Postanjyan: “The prosecutor in Cyprus just documented that the Prime Minister is hiding the truth”

July 02,2013 11:35

Today, in a conversation with Aravot.am, the Secretary of “Heritage” faction Zaruhi Postanjyan assured that the statement of the Prosecutor of Cyprus is not news, because everything regarding the Prime Minister’s offshore scandal is already clear.

It’s worth to mention that the Cyprus Attorney General has told the “Liberty” r/s that it is impossible to be a shareholder of an offshore company in their country without the knowledge of given person or a permission of the authorized representative. In this way he had denied the Prime Minister’s explanation that he had nothing to do with this company, and that similar companies can be registered in the name of Nicole Pashinyan without his knowledge.

According to Zaruhi Postanjyan, “Everything was clear from the words of the Prime Minister at the Parliament that he was not telling the truth. We did not learn it from the prosecutor of Cyprus, unlike our prosecutors, he performed his duty and presented the requirement of acting law without having interest to defend or support Tigran Sargsyan.”

To our questions that Serzh Sargsyan during his recent meeting rebuked the Attorney General, should we also keep in mind that under these remarks the Prime Minister and Kchoyan have immunity and we the so-called “have nothing to do”, Zaruhi Postanjyan replied,-. “What happened at Serzh Sargsyan’s office, which was called as a discussion of effective management of budget resources, strengthen supervision over the implementation of government programs and reducing the risks of corruption, was a poor performance of the main role-player. Generally, if there is a discussion that nearly two dozen people participate,

at least ten of them should be able to express an opinion, and if the two dozen are top-ranking government officials, a country, which as a corrupted country, is in the “best” disgraceful five among 47 EU countries, the discussions about corruption could not possibly implemented in the form of listening to a monologue.”

 

I’ve been a lawyer for 9 years, as a lawyer I have some experience in contact with the criminal world. When I watched this so-called “discussions”, I got the impression that a group of people of the criminal world gathered and the most influential of them, the leader of the group, is making an attempt to say a word that will resemble the word of mafia godfather. The leader of the group was settling scores from one member of his subordinated group, trying to make it clear for both those present and others, trying to remind that I am the decision-maker here, I know who represents what here, and generally I am informed about everything. In other words, Serzh Sargsyan made it clear that each of those present are his subordinates, I have respective discrediting evidence against you and generally I am the decision maker. If I wish I will tell the prosecutor to start the process, I will not wish, I will not start. At this moment, my assignment refers not to the embezzlement of 700 billion, but get involved with a light, small-sized embezzlements and small officials, nothing more. It is not allowed to mane independent statement and discussions about the quantity of embezzlement by the state officials, size of abuses and volume of allegations. The quantity, size and volume should be specified with Serzh Sargsyan, and besides, execution of all future activities. I got such impression from that meeting.

Hripsimeh JEBEJYAN

Media can quote materials of Aravot.am with hyperlink to the certain material quoted. The hyperlink should be placed on the first passage of the text.

Comments (0)

Leave a Reply