According to RA NA Vice President Hermine Naghdalyan, Moldovan Ombudsman successfully advertised her, and probably succeeded to raise her price at the customers.
“What is right, is right, there was nothing new in the speeches delivered by the Ombudsman from Moldova, or rather the lawyer sent to Armenia by Azerbaijan,”- expressed her opinion RA NA Vice President Hermine Naghdalyan in a conversation with “Aravot” referring to the
statements of Moldovan lawyer at the National Assembly of Armenia, adding that the words said by the lady are old, many times repeated, and they were thoughts and figures long ago boring European politicians and well informed people, which do not leave impression on anybody and anywhere, and bring no dividends, except Azerbaijan. “But as you see, they can still be used for rent as a pretext by some clever entrepreneur women,”- said the NA Speaker. According to her, the ideas expressed were one-to-one repeat twenty years ago fictions of Azerbaijani. “I think it is also insulting to the authors for copied plagiarism. Also, customers can become offended: you got an order, at least work a little bit on it, express with our own words. But, no, she literally transcribed from dear Ilham Heydarovich. Why are people paid for only?”
As for dissatisfactions to me expressed by the alien lady, as well as to the statements that the person presiding the session as if had stopped her speech ahead of the time, and did not let her finish it, Mrs. Naghdalyan said that they have behaved themselves as true civilized nation and not like some few. “In our country there is a true democracy and freedom of speech, that’s why we listened to her without interrupting, in compliance with regulations, and answered tactfully and with discreet. By the way, we all remember how recently an Armenian NA Deputy, with brutal manners, was not allowed to deliver a speech in Baku during the top international meeting.
Read also
Frankly, there was a lure to explain the person sold for a couple of oil-cents, or a few tablespoons of caviar that this war was imposed and unleashed on us in response to just demand for self-determination by Karabakh people, which is an inalienable right to any nation, that Khojaly massacre has been organized by their kindred, by its customers, the experience of which they gained by atrocities in Sumgait, Baku, Kirovabad, that the whole world precisely knows it, and many other things, but real tolerance of thinking, commitment to European values, and also the status of the owner imposeed certain commitments before us. Thus, we had to be satisfied with only a few disclosing remarks. Of course, there should be no doubt about the Ombudsman’s actions of being ordered and sponsored, this is evidenced by a number of phenomena.”
Our interlocutor noted that the Ombudsman’s duty is to defend human rights in its country, and in this conference, the lady should have brought up issues of human rights in Moldova. “In the framework of Aurelia’s reporting, the God’s just required to raise first of all the issues of Transdniestria, but not the interests of her own nation but Azerbaijan’s were more important for her, she was the lawyer thereof, on the account of Moldovan taxpayers. For this reason, the lion’s share of the time was allocated to Azerbaijani, only a few words about
the situation in Georgia to divert the attention, and then, by residual principle, she remembered her primary responsibilities, about human rights defender in Moldova, but, naturally, there was no time left for it,”-said Mrs. Naghdalyan.
As for the recording of the speech, the Vice President of RA NA said,- “Khanum explains that she had record all the speeches, but it was not so. The witnesses have noticed how she turned the recording on before her speech, she cannot submit other records. No other records are placed on her website either. In other words, it does not sound like she recorded all her speeches, probably only the ones that should be presented for payment.”
During her press conference in Chişinău the lawyer was explaining that the purpose of her speech was to draw the attention of the international community on human rights violations. Mrs. Naghdalyan said in irony,- “I’d love to believe, but saying people she purely understands purely ethnic Azerbaijani people. For the balance, she could have said a word or two of Armenian affected by the conflict. But, no. May be the flaming fighter of Azerbaijanis rights Mrs. Aurelia khanum intended to seize the attention of the international community on the human rights issues and Baku conference, where she was a month ago? Maybe there are more of such records? Again, no.”
Finally, according to our interlocutor, the problem is not why the lady spoke, but the fact that she had spoken. “For example, I have also delivered a speech about the same problems in Baku at the Azerbaijani President’s residence. But it was straightforward speech. Many times we insisted in front of the world that a lie is disgusting …” “It is not proper to a man, to whom its country trusted the high title of human rights defender, to go down to obvious and cheap lie, dirty defamation until reshaping the facts, turning the reality in one hundred percent. It is unacceptable to mislead people, distort the reality, to serve as a tool in the hands of others. It is not worthy of the high title of an ombudsman, is not worthy of a man. The representatives of Ombudsmen Association immediately expressed their regrets and disapproval of such behavior of their partner. The representative of Moldovan Parliament also spoke very impressively about it pointing out the unawareness of the lawyer, political nearsightedness, and non professionalism.”
In the end, referring to inside out show “performed” by Moldovan lady regarding threats and risks “before the curtain”, Hermine Naghdalyan said,- “Not only political shortsightedness, but simply sacred naivety becomes clear. Relevant institutions did not report about threatening calls. She could not imagine that there are cameras installed at the entrance and lobby of the hotel. But the anxiety that she would be taken to somewhere, is generally
ridiculous, which Armenian would dishonor itself with Azerbaijani leftovers. It appears that the fraud is the main tool of the Parliamentarian lawyer Aurelia Grigoriu. Instead, she succeeded to advertize herself and maybe she will be successful to increase the price with the customers.”
Interviewer Nelly GRIGORYAN
