The rationale behind the draft legislation in Ukraine aimed at the establishment of an Ethics Council to assist the process of election (appointment) of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) members is welcomed, as it intends to urgently address the previously raised issue of integrity and ethics of the HCJ. This is among the key conclusions of the urgent opinion prepared by the Venice Commission and by the Council of Europe’s Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law.
Establishment of judicial councils, in charge of judicial appointment, promotions and discipline, is an important element for the independence of the judicial system. A judicial reform which does not tackle the functioning of the HCJ and the integrity of its members is doomed to fail. The Venice Commission and the Directorate welcome the proposal to establish an Ethics Council for a period of six years to assist the bodies that elect (appoint) the members of the High Council of Justice in determining whether the applicants for the position of member of the HCJ and the current members of the HCJ meet the criteria of professional ethics and integrity. It is also welcomed that the composition of this Ethics Council builds on the Venice Commission’s earlier opinions, especially as concerns the participation of international experts. However, it is recommended to expressly limit the international participation in the Ethics Council to a single mandate of six years.
The Venice Commission and the Directorate deplore that draft law no. 5068 is a partial measure and does not provide for a holistic reform of the judiciary. Nonetheless, the Venice Commission and the Directorate are mindful of the urgency of the situation and acknowledge that the reforms should be undertaken to remedy these urgent problems.
Read also
Council of Europe
