“No, March 1 is not revealed at all. It is deliberately hidden, watered down, closed.” Aram Manukyan to Nikol Pashinyan
“And what do you think, is March 1 revealed? After all, a question of this kind cannot arise,” to the question, “Do you think March 1 is revealed?” because RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan believes that March 1 is revealed, this is how the Armenian National Congres(ANC) member Aram Manukyan responded.
On March 1, ANC members participated in a memorial service and a march in memory of the victims of March 1.
Read also
Aram Manukyan stated that the case is revealed when a trial and a verdict are passed. What was the verdict of the court, who was the organizers and participants, who were the implementers, and what punishment did they receive? In his opinion, when these questions are answered, we can only say that the crime has been revealed in this case.
Contrary to Nikol Pashinyan’s opinion, Aram Manukyan said: “No, March 1 is not revealed at all. Deliberately covered up, watered down, and closed. Moreover, it was done formally and through the court, through the Constitutional Court, the promotion of judges, and the appointment of ministers. And look at the composition of today’s parliament; you will see who the implementers were and why they were there. Where were the people who carried out March 1, and who were the people who were caught and suddenly found themselves abroad? No, don’t you hide a needle in a bag? Who doesn’t know the authors of March 1, and those who shot and faked it? Was it a state system or a criminal group? The state system organized that crime. Books, films, thousands of witnesses, and testimonies document it.” Aram Manukyan replied that you say it was covered up, that is, did this government also cover it up?
“Certainly, the verdict of the Constitutional Court was sufficient, thanks to which Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan appeared in the parliament with their factions. If they were judged and the case of March 1 had at least reached the Court, why would they be in the parliament? Who took them to the parliament? Nikol Pashinyan, his Court, and the judges he appointed. It is not even something to discuss, to express an opinion.”
Aram Manukyan replied to the observation that Nikol Pashinyan cooperates with Robert Kocharyan, or was it simply Nikol Pashinyan’s omission? “It was very beneficial for Nikol Pashinyan that Robert Kocharian was the opposition. It also benefited Robert Kocharyan because he could not even in his wildest dreams think that he would have a faction of 38 people and his businesses would not be lacking; the team would not be lacking. Nikol Pashinyan and Robert Kocharyan treat each other like a Siamese couple. Why did Nikol Pashinyan get so many votes: he organized and helped Robert Kocharyan organize a powerful rally, and the people were afraid to see who would come, go, and elect Nikol, and it’s so simple.”
Tatev HARUTYUNYAN
