“Artsakh could not be looted; did you like it? Why did they rob? What do you feel about the fact that they signed? Don’t you know, if you didn’t sign, you were leaving a perspective for me and you, your child, my child? But when you sign it, it dissolves the state; whօ are you, boy, where did they find you?” speaking to Aravot. am about the decree signed by the President of Artsakh, said Andranik Kocharyan, the chairman of the Commission of Defense and Security of the National Assembly.
Andranik Kocharyan answered our question: was there any other way out? How could a person make a different decision when the gun was held to a person’s forehead? “I would have taken that gun because this is already a different problem. If he had come, didn’t he know that they would put a gun to his head? He could have committed suicide; it was more correct.”
To the question, if Shahramanyan committed suicide, would the Artsakh issue be resolved, Kocharyan answered. “It was a question of keeping perspective.” According to the observation of experts, when the decision is imposed, that decision cannot have international legal force; he answered: “That coercion still needs to be examined. I think the investigative commission still has two months; I must try to understand what happened.” Andranik Kocharyan answered the question: Did Shahramanyan’s suicide solve the problem for you when the matter was already over? Do you blame the President for a few weeks?
“Didn’t he know that there were a few weeks left, that they demanded his resignation, discussed what was on the table? Before that, he excluded any dialogue: why did you go to Evlakh?
Read also
Moreover, didn’t you see that he was not even accepted in Evlakh? Governing institutions are dissolved by a man who had 22 votes. Those 22 will answer, all of them headed by Davit Ishkhanyan. And let Samvel Shahramanyan think about the price of his future life.”
Hripsime JEBEJYAN
