My attitude toward major (or big) sports has changed dramatically since betting became widespread. It spoils the enjoyment, stripping the match or game of its aesthetic value. It’s akin to placing bets on whether a soprano will hit the high “D” (“Re”) during a concert, saying to each other, “Let’s bet 5,000 AMD to make the concert interesting.” In this scenario, it’s clear that people wouldn’t be listening to the music, because music is about more than hitting specific notes.
My interest in the Olympics has also diminished since politics began to infiltrate it, particularly after the 1980 Games, when the West boycotted the Soviet Union, and then, in response, the Soviet Union and its allies boycotted the Los Angeles Games. Is this how superpowers unite nations? It’s the same story with the current exclusion of Russian athletes from various competitions and the Olympics.
Adding to this unpleasant political tone is the issue of sexual ambiguity, so to speak. If a man changes his gender, that is, of course, his personal decision. However, if he competes in women’s events after transitioning, retaining some physical advantages of being male, it is obviously unfair and violates the rights of the other competitors. Thus, an overly zealous pursuit of human rights can lead to their gross violation.
Naturally, I am most interested in the performances of Armenian athletes. To be honest, I don’t understand those who criticize our team members. I believe we should be grateful to all of them, both those who won medals and those who didn’t. Given the conditions and budget provided by our state, their performances were simply outstanding. If the conditions and budget are inadequate, that’s an issue to take up with the state.
Read also
Aram Abrahamyan
