Video Newsfeed
Editor's Column
Those who have watched the interviews with Armenia’s second and third presidents and then read the current prime minister’s nervous reactions have rightly noticed that—regardless of the content—what stands out most is the contrast in style, tone, and vocabulary. Pashinyan’s speech is far removed from the norms of political debate: it is undisciplined, quarrelsome, gossipy—fit for a “street brawl.” It reflects not only the intellectual and cultural traits of Armenia’s current leader, but also the mentality of his intended audience—the “people” as imagined by the Civil…
The Obsession with Starting from “Zero Point”
Should we accept that our behavior is also shaped by…
“The ‘Right Words’ Aimed at Destroying Everything”
“The people” and “the citizen” are among those words Father…
How to Convince Cult Members
Can Jürgen Habermas’s prescriptions be applied to this question? In…
The Constitution Must Be Changed—But the Reference to the Independence Declaration Must Stay
The current Constitution allows Pashinyan to reproduce himself in power…
Christianity as a Real Basis for Governance
Is that even possible? Whenever I speak or write about…
The Era of “Wokeism” Is Drawing to a Close
A person should be perceived as an individual, not as…
“Conquer Yourself Rather Than the World”
That was the advice of the 17th-century French philosopher René…
“Cold and Dark,” “Plunder,” “Peace”
What are the main narratives of Armenian reality? Former Russian,…
Programs
