“Yesterday, in response to Hripsime Stambulyan’s questions, the Prime Minister diverted the answer to the question according to his behavior and took it to the political field, especially to the realm of insults, which is not acceptable for us,” Armenia faction leader Seyran Ohanyan said in reference to the incident of the previous day during the NA plenary session on March 3. He mentioned that he had to answer Pashinyan’s question earlier, “Is Sanasar Sanasar or Kubatli for you?”
Ohanyan mentioned, “Ideologically, in terms of the liberation of the homeland, it is Sanasar for us. After 93 years, 27 years later, it became Kubatlu. You said that it was returned and that those settlements are Sanasar for me, because people gave their lives for them. Who Kubatlu is for will be found out later during the negotiations.” Ohanyan stressed that his leaders, unlike this government, did not order the withdrawal of troops; on the contrary, they ordered to strengthen the positions. “Shushi and Hadrut were handed over during your rule. Is there an opposite opinion here?”
Seyran Ohanyan asked. He also inquired why the insulting expressions and descriptions addressed to the opposition were not applied to the Turks.
Read also
Luiza Sukiasyan
