“It is a different matter how efficient the pressure is, in any case, all initiatives regarding that are praiseworthy,” Garegin Chugaszyan, a member of the Vahe Avetyan civic initiative, said, talking about the list of questions on the Harsnakar incident made public by the National Assembly groups yesterday during a conversation with www.aravot.am.
Our interlocutor didn’t wish to talk about the content of the questions, since in his opinion, there were two more important issues, to which one should pay all attention. The fact that
counselors have not been allowed to get acquainted with the progress of the preliminary investigation yet and that the legal successor of the victim has not been determined so far. “More than a month has passed and no logic can be applied to why the legal successor has not been determined. What kind of an attitude is it? The counselors are not offered an opportunity to get acquainted with the details of the case, in order that they have a possibility to ask right questions,” Garegin Chugaszyan said. www.aravot.am inquired whether it wouldn’t be better in that very context to work in concord with the parliamentary groups and to include, at least, the questions regarding the counselors and determining the legal successor of the victim in the published list. Mr. Chugaszyan noted that there was cooperation, since members of the movement were also representatives of different parties. In any case, it was hard for him to answer what principle and logic was applied to draw up the list of questions, “Parliamentary work is parliamentary work, our work is social. We can speak on behalf of our movement and I am not entitled to answer on behalf of the parliamentary groups. I don’t know what logic they applied.”
Read also
Nelly GRIGORYAN
